Legal Opinion

Vortanz v. Elmhurst Memorial Hospital

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1989No. 2-88-0148PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Plaintiff, Russell Vortanz, appeals from the denial of a motion to vacate an order dismissing his complaint with prejudice as a sanction pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 219(c) (107 111. 2d R. 219(c)) because of his failure to produce an expert witness for deposition on the date the trial judge had directed the deposition to proceed. Plaintiff contends on appeal that the trial court should have vacated the dismissal order for the following reasons: (1) the trial court did not have any authority pursuant to Rule 219(c) to dismiss the case on its own motion; (2) plaintiff had no notice that a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maras v. BertholdtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Humboldt-Armitage Corp. v. Illinois Fair Plan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Wilson v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Barnes v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Peoples Gas, Light & Coke Co. v. Chicago Black Improvement Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farley Metals, Inc. v. Barber Colman Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. In Re Marriage of GetautasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Ratkovich v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Mortimer v. River Oaks Toyota, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Juszczyk v. FloresAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API