Legal Opinion

People v. Irizarry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1014Where, as here, “a court charges the next lesser included offense of the crime alleged in the indictment, but refuses to charge lesser degrees than that . . . the defendant’s conviction of the crime alleged in the indictment forecloses a challenge to the court’s refusal to charge the remote lesser included offenses” (People v Boettcher, 69 NY2d 174, 180 [1987]; see People v Green, 5 NY3d 538, 545 [2005]; People v Alston, 77 AD3d 762, 762 [2010]). “Thus, review of the defendant’s challenge to the [Supreme] Court’s refusal to charge manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser-included offense…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BoettcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. GorhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. AlstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CephasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. HiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Irizarry v. KeyserDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  4. People v. HiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API