City of Macon v. Ries
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Dissent
Gilbert and Bell, JJ.,
dissenting. The plaintiffs made returns of their property at valuations clearly stated by them, and thus admitted to be fair. In these circumstances, they should not have relief in equity to avoid the assessments made by the city authorities, without tendering the amounts due and payable under their own valuations. Conceivably the assessors might reduce the valuations as stated in such returns, but it is not insisted that any such reduction should be made. So far as appears, the plaintiffs are merely complaining of the act of the assessors in raising such valuations.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Raymondv v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Schlesinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- People's National Bank v. MaryeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sanders v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.