Chaplin v. Freeland

This was an action by appellee against appellant, -to recover for services rendered to a servant of appellant, who was injured .while in his employ.

There are three paragraphs of complaint, each of which was tested by demurrer, and its sufficiency properly presented here. The first paragraph is clearly good. It alleges that appellee was a physician and surgeon, and was called and employed by appellant to treat one Fields, who had been injured; that in pursuance of such employment the services were rendered, and the value, etc.

The second paragraph alleges that appellant Chaplin was a resident…