Legal Opinion
United States v. Tulloch
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 12, 2004No. 02-1749, 02-2410PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
These appeals raise ongoing issues pertaining to supervised release conditions that were first addressed in this circuit in United States v. Melendez-Santana, 353 F.3d 93 (1st Cir.2003). In this opinion, we hold that a mandatory drug testing condition may be included in the written sentencing judgment without having been mentioned at sentencing. We also hold that the standard supervised release conditions set out in the United States Sentencing Guidelines may be adopted by reference at the sentencing hearing.
I. Background
In separate criminal proceedings, Higinio Alejandro-Castillo…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Torres-AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Melendez-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Antonio D. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Rosie DigglesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Mescual-CruzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Ortiz-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.