Legal Opinion

Smith v. Henry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1923No. 10908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced by the defendant in error to have the title to certain lands, the record title to which was in the plaintiff in error, decreed to be held in trust for defendant in error. Judgment was entered' in the lower court for the defendant in error, and plaintiff: in error has prosecuted this appeal and assigned as error:

“First. The court erred in rendering judgment for the defendant in error.
“Second. The court erred in making his special findings of fact, as they iWiere not warranted by the testimony.
“Third. The court erred in his conclusions of law as applied to the facts in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Welch v. CottonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mathews v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API