Legal Opinion

Exon v. Dancke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Multnomah County: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. Suit by Hannah C. Exon against Michael Dancke and Adelaide, his wife, to declare a deed to be a mortgage, and for leave to redeem. The matter was referred to Geo. A. Brodie, Esq., who reported in favor of the defendants, and a decree was entered accordingly, from which the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean'

This is a suit to declare a deedj absolute in form, to be a mortgage, and for leave to redeem. The facts are that on April 30, 1885, H. C. Carmack, John Kenworthy, C. C. Hall, and John S. Simmons, at the request of John Exon, the husband of plaintiff, borrowed of the First National1 Bank of East Portland, on their individual note, the sum of one thousand and fifty dollars, and delivered the same to Exon to enable him to pay off and discharge certain indebtedness of his then due and owing. In order to secure and save them harmless from any loss by reason of having given this note, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Brinkman v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bloomer v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Cook v. . TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ThomasonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Anderson v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ambrose v. HuntingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. F. B. Collins Inv. Co. v. WaideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Randall v. LingwallOregon Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API