Legal Opinion

Parrott v. Pelusio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In these consolidated civil actions for assault, defendant first contends that the evidence concerning his departure from the jurisdiction was erroneously admitted. The circumstances, however, adequately support an inference that defendant’s flight was indicative of his "consciousness of guilt” and the trial court properly instructed the jury that such proof, although of limited probative force, could be considered along with the other evidence (see People v Yazum, 13 NY2d 302). While plaintiffs should not have been allowed to establish…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. People v. YazumNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Van Bokkelen v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. People v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Shaw v. TagueNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lanpont v. Savvas Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Mack v. Lydia E. Hall HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Allinger v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Byfield v. ChapmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API