Legal Opinion
Hitsman v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 28, 2020No. 19-562Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Clauns No. 19-562T Filed: January 28, 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION ) ROBERT HITSMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Pro Se; RCFC 12(b)(1); Subject-Matter Ve } Jurisdiction; Tax Refund Claim; 26 } US.C. § 6532; 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a); THE UNITED STATES, } Default Judgment. ) Defendant. ) ) Robert Hitsman, Dent, MN, plaintiff pro se. Margaret E. Sheer, Trial Attorney, Richard E. Zuckerman, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, David I. Pincus, Chief, G. Robson Stewart, Assistant Chief, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Court of Federal Claims Section,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.