State v. Aguilar
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
McFADDEN, Justice,
dissenting. .
I must dissent from the opinion of the majority because the trial court improperly directed the jury that as a matter of law Aguilar was under oath at the time of the alleged false statement. The elements of perjury as defined in I.C. § 18-5401 are (1) that defendant has taken an oath, (2) before a competent tribunal, officer or person, and (3) that he wilfully made a false statement (4) as to a material matter.
The state must allege and prove to the jury each essential element of the crime charged. See, e.g. State v. Dunn, 44 Idaho 636, 258 P. 553 (1927); State…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D. H. Roe and Stratoray Oil, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Scott Sheldon and Mitchell Paul SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Willie Ray Harrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Thomas H. Brooks and August J. Maureau, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- State v. ScheminiskyIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.