Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Constantin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1963No. 42741PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLee, P. J.

E. Constantin,' Jr., and others, doing business as the Southland Company, sued United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, under the provisions of a fidelity bond, to recover certain losses due to the .alleged dishonest and criminal, acts of Thomas Plummer, an employee of the plaintiff.

Simply stated, the declaration in effect, charged in detail that the plaintiff had suffered direct losses of money and property on account of certain dishonest and *816criminal acts, committed by the named employee during Ms employment, and against which protection was provided in the policy of insurance wliich was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gradsky v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bank of BatesvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Curran & Treadaway, Inc. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  5. JONES (HOBSON P.) v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alfalfa Electric Coop., Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API