Livingstone v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.
We granted leave to consider whether the statute of limitations bars the majority of the alleged use tax1 sought to be assessed against the derivatively liable corporate officer, where there was no issuance of a notice of intent to assess against the officer and where the notice of final assessment was issued more than four years after a majority of the assessment and the taxable period.
We would hold that the use tax statute of limitation found in MCL 205.100(3); MSA 7.555(10)(3)2 *776has no application to derivatively liable corporate officers. Consequently, the limitation period does not bar a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Van Orman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jersey Shore State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McKisson v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Henderson v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gaetano Rizzo v. State of Mich. Dep't of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- SMK, LLC v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Stackpoole v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Fradco, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.