Legal Opinion

Givens v. Spalding Cloak Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTriable, J.

Plaintiff's action is to recover damages for alleged burns to ber scalp charged to have been negligently inflicted by defendants in giving plaintiff a hair-dressing, known .among the ladies as a “permanent wave,” or, as it is frequently called, a “permanent.” She sued for $7500 and recovered a verdict and judgment for $3000 against Spalding Cloak Company, but the jury found in favor of defendant Brisboise.

The Spalding Cloak Company duly appealed; the plaintiff took the initial steps for an appeal against defendant Brisboise, but failed to perfect same; so the case now stands on the Cloak…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pearson v. ButtsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  2. Epps v. RagsdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Scott v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Boillot v. Income Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Ferguson v. Creative Hairdressers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API