Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1992No. A91A2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s grant of appellee’s motion to suppress. Specifically, the State contends the court erred in granting the motion on the basis of facts and law not alleged in appellee’s written motion.

Appellee was indicted for possession of cocaine, and in his motion to suppress, appellee questioned the existence of probable cause for the search. Appellee subsequently amended the motion to suppress to allege, in addition, that there was insufficient probable cause for a general search of the premises when there was arguably only probable cause for the search of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sampson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Jamison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. State v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Seaman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. State v. RoddyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API