Rowe v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentDeen, Presiding Judge
I must respectfully dissent to the position articulated in the majority opinion, for the following reasons. Under Georgia law, conspiracy to commit a substantive offense merges with, or becomes a lesser included crime of, the substantive offense charged if and only if it is found that the substantive crime has been completed; in that fact situation the doctrine of merger prescribes that the accused be convicted of the greater — i.e., the substantive — offense only. OCGA § 16-4-8; Kilgore v. State, 251 Ga. 291 (305 SE2d 82) (1983); Roberts v. State, 242 Ga. 634 (250 SE2d 482) (1978); Scott v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State v. EstevezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- McCrary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.