Legal Opinion

Melton Management, Inc. v. Krott-Shaughnessy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 14, 2004No. 4D03-2383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Melton Management, Inc. d/b/a McDonald’s (“Melton”) appeals an order denying its motion to tax costs and abate proceedings under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.420 and 1.525. We affirm.

Valerie Krott-Shaughnessy (“Shaugh-nessy”) filed a personal injury action against Melton for negligence. After extensive discovery, and on the eve of trial, Shaughnessy voluntarily dismissed the action. Melton’s counsel intentionally did not file a Rule 1.525 motion within thirty days of the dismissal because Melton’s counsel believed Shaughnessy “did the *321right thing” by voluntarily dismissing the action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. KrathenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Smiles v. YoungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL, ACTIVITIES, INC. v. LatimerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramos v. Orthodontic Centers of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API