Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1935No. 25882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by the defendant in error, Claud Bishop, as plaintiff, against the H. & I-I. Trucking Company, a copartnership consisting of O. L. Harvey and S. R. Hazelrigg, admitted Glass “B” carriers under the laws of the state of Oklahoma, and another, to recover damages for injuries to the person and property of the plaintiff, incurred through the alleged negligent operation of defendants’ truck upon a highway in Oklahoma county.

The case-made does not contain a copy of' the summons, or the sheriff’s return thereon, but it appears…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clem Oil Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. F. C. Austin Manufacturing Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. Wm. Cameron & Co. v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Smith v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. McGrath v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Osborn v. White Eagle Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Weber v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Davis v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API