Legal Opinion
Beasley v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided December 12, 1928No. 6786PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. A general demurrer goes to tlie whole pleading to which it is addressed, and should he overruled if any part thereof is good in substance. Blaylock v. Hackel, 164 Ga. 257 (5) (138 S. E. 333).
(а) The petition alleges a cause of action in favor of petitioner against the other parties to the contract therein set out, for the recovery by petitioner of the amounts claimed by him under said contract against such parties; and for this reason the petition as a whole was not subject to general demurrer.
(б) Where a petition is filed against several defendants, a separate demurrer by two of them, in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Rivers v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Turk v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Benson v. Abbott, Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Gamble v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Smith v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Anderson v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Candler v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.