Coleman v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this appeal, Richard Coleman contends, and the State agrees, that the sen*240tence imposed for violation of probation constituted a departure sentence for which written reasons were required. See State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). The record is clear, however, that the trial court did not intend to impose a departure sentence; therefore, upon remand, the trial court may depart from the guidelines by providing valid written reasons. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990); Brown v. State, 639 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
Next, Coleman asserts that the trial court imposed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- State v. VanhornSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Burch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nieves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Pickett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996