Garrison Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. No. 1 Steel Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Justice
I respectfully dissent. Although my vote is consistent with the outcome achieved by the trial court, I find it necessary first to address briefly my disagreement with the trial court as to a procedural matter. I thereafter address the merits of the personal-jurisdiction issue.
*815A. The Trial Court’s Treatment of No. 1 Steel’s Motion as Summary-Judgment Motion
I cannot agree with the trial court’s treatment of the motion filed by No. 1 Steel Products, Inc., as a motion for a summary judgment. The motion was one for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a ground cognizable…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.