Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garrison Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. No. 1 Steel Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 29, 2011No. 1091781Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

I respectfully dissent. Although my vote is consistent with the outcome achieved by the trial court, I find it necessary first to address briefly my disagreement with the trial court as to a procedural matter. I thereafter address the merits of the personal-jurisdiction issue.

*815A. The Trial Court’s Treatment of No. 1 Steel’s Motion as Summary-Judgment Motion

I cannot agree with the trial court’s treatment of the motion filed by No. 1 Steel Products, Inc., as a motion for a summary judgment. The motion was one for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a ground cognizable…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API