McMullan v. WOHLGEMUTH
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mb. Justice Pomeboy:
I find it ironical that the Court, especially at this particular time in our national experience, through a restrictive and erroneous reading of legislative acts, should bar a large metropolitan newspaper from govern*167ment records of disbursement of public monies to private individuals. Since my reading of these same statutes cannot be reconciled with that of the majority, I must respectfully dissent.
The starting point in answering a question involving access to government-controlled information in Pennsylvania is the Act of June 21, 1957, P. L. 390, 65…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Klein v. Board of Tax Supervisors of Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.