Legal Opinion · Dissent

McMullan v. WOHLGEMUTH

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1973No. Appeal, 77Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mb. Justice Pomeboy:

I find it ironical that the Court, especially at this particular time in our national experience, through a restrictive and erroneous reading of legislative acts, should bar a large metropolitan newspaper from govern*167ment records of disbursement of public monies to private individuals. Since my reading of these same statutes cannot be reconciled with that of the majority, I must respectfully dissent.

The starting point in answering a question involving access to government-controlled information in Pennsylvania is the Act of June 21, 1957, P. L. 390, 65…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Klein v. Board of Tax Supervisors of Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API