Legal Opinion
Isaac v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 4, 2008No. 1D07-6179PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
989 So.2d 1217 (2008)
Lemuel ISAAC, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D07-6179.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
September 4, 2008.
Lemuel Isaac, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
Appellant challenges the denial of his rule 3.850 motion which asserted the trial court's imposition of a departure sentence, based upon a finding that appellant's prior convictions indicated an escalating pattern of criminal activity, violated the tenets of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), as clarified…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Barfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. DarrisawSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019