Legal Opinion

Dowell v. McKinnon

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 29, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The trial judge held that the defendants had probable cause to initiate the criminal prosecution against the plaintiff and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

On July 10,1986, Henry E. McKinnon, an employee of B & G Wholesalers, Inc., procured a warrant for the arrest of Michael D. Dowell (who was also a B & G employee) on a charge of grand larceny. The affidavit in the warrant averred that, on June 23, 1986, Mr. Dowell did “steal, take and carry away [a] quantity of cognac, 4½ cases of the value of appr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evans v. PerkeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  2. Sullivan v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. Cohen v. CookTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lewis v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Peoples Protective Life Insurance Co. v. NeuhoffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Lawson v. The Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API