Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1006A sex offender facing risk level classification under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA) has a due process right to be present at the hearing (see People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 133 [2000]; People v Arrahman, 83 AD3d 680 [2011]; People v Gonzalez, 69 AD3d 819 [2010]). “ ‘To establish whether a defendant, by failing to appear at a SORA hearing, has waived the right to be present, evidence must be shown that the defendant was advised of the hearing date, of the right to be present at the hearing, and that the hearing would be conducted in his or her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. David W.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. ArrahmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. DistaffenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Gutierrez-LuceroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. Gutierrez-LuceroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API