Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1894No. 1367PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

— This is an action by the respondent against the city of Spokane, for damages received by re*169spondent while acting as a duly authorized scavenger for said city, in removing the contents of a cesspool and disposing of the same in the Spokane river from the city dump structure, by reason of respondent and his team being precipitated from said dump structure into the Spokane river on account of the alleged unsafe structure maintained by the city. The complaint contained the usual allegations of negligence on the part of the city and damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kromer v. . HeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Goodrich v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Reliance Life Insurance v. GarthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Walsh v. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Inman v. W. E. Roche Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API