Legal Opinion · Dissent

McSwain v. Charleston County Board of Trustees

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 2012No. 27201Published

1DissentJustice Pleicones

I respectfully dissent.

I. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

Although in my view Parent likely failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, I would not disturb the circuit court’s finding on this issue. See Hyde v. S.C. Dep’t of Mental Health, 314 S.C. 207, 208, 442 S.E.2d 582, 582-83 (1994) (whether administrative remedies must be exhausted is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court). Nevertheless, I address this point because I disagree with the majority’s analysis.

For urgency to constitute an exception to the requirement that a party exhaust her administrative remedies,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Hyde v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Board of Trustees v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API