McSwain v. Charleston County Board of Trustees
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Pleicones
I respectfully dissent.
I. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies
Although in my view Parent likely failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, I would not disturb the circuit court’s finding on this issue. See Hyde v. S.C. Dep’t of Mental Health, 314 S.C. 207, 208, 442 S.E.2d 582, 582-83 (1994) (whether administrative remedies must be exhausted is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court). Nevertheless, I address this point because I disagree with the majority’s analysis.
For urgency to constitute an exception to the requirement that a party exhaust her administrative remedies,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Hyde v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Board of Trustees v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.