Joly v. Weber
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Lazarus, J. 1.The wife who has left to her husband the administration of her paraphernal property, may afterwards withdraw it from him, and'has a right of action against her husband for the restitution of her paraphernal effects and other fruits.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Lazarus, J. 1.The wife who has left to her husband the administration of her paraphernal property, may afterwards withdraw it from him, and'has a right of action against her husband for the restitution of her paraphernal effects and other fruits. C. C. 2387, 2391. 2.The husband having taken charge of the administration of the paraphernal effects of the wife, under the appraisement made, when the same was adjudicated to her and having entered the same on his hooks at said appraised value, mixed these goods with the bal anee of the…
1Opinion of the Court
*807The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Poché, J.
Plaintiff’s object in this suit is to be restored to the possession and administration of her paraphernal property.
The main facts which underlie this controversy are stated in the opinion rendered in the case of Henry F. Ludowig et al. vs. Mrs. Benoit Ludowig Weber et al. (No. 8729). A few days before their marriage, the parties to this suit entered into a contract of marriage in which it was stipulated that there should be a community of acquets and gains between the future spouses, and that each spouse should pay his and her respective debts…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Fleitas v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Carter v. Third Dist. Homestead Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Falconer v. FalconerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Jenkins v. MaierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Wilkinson v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.