Legal Opinion
Kalbfleish v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 5, 1937No. M-266; M-246; M-284; M-241; M-271; M-299; M-307; M-304; M-248; M-288; M-297; M-292; M-293; M-306; M-287; M-268; M-262; 41871; M-245; M-308; M-296; 42789; M-260; M-263; 41869; M-291; 41870; M-303; M-252; M-270; M-250; M-301; M-247; M-267; M-285; M-305; M-295; 42804; M-253; M-261Published
1Opinion of the Court
*624MEMORANDUM
BY THE COURT
These several cases have been submitted to the court without oral argument with the understanding that they will follow and be controlled by the decision of the court in R. J. Bartholomew v. United States, No. M-239, which is this day announced, the facts in the Bartholomew case being identical with the facts in these cases. The decision in the Bartholomew case follows our decision in R. L. Montague v. United States, 79 C. Cls. 624, in which the legal question here involved is fully discussed. The defendant accepted the decision in the Montague case as a correct…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Montague v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934