Legal Opinion

In Re Pennie & Edmonds LLP

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 14, 2003No. 02-7177Published

1Opinion of the Court

323 F.3d 86

In re PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP, Appellant.

No. 02-7177.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued: September 11, 2002.

Decided: March 14, 2003.

Frank H. Wright, Frank H. Wright & Associates, New York, N.Y., for Appellant.

Before: NEWMAN and F.I. PARKER, Circuit Judges; and UNDERHILL,* District Judge.

Judge UNDERHILL dissents with a separate opinion.

JOHN O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

1

This appeal presents a narrow issue concerning the applicable mens rea standard when a trial judge, sua sponte, initiates a post-trial Rule 11 sanction proceeding because a lawyer permitted a client to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Norman TurkishCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API