Legal Opinion

Richards & Knox v. Bradley

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1900No. Sac. No. 657PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from an order, made and entered on motion of plaintiff, dismissing the action. It appears from the bill of exceptions that the cause was here once before on appeal, and, the plaintiff confessing error in the overruling of defendant’s demurrer, the “judgment was reversed and the cause remanded.” The remittitur was, on motion of defendants, entered in the minutes of the trial court June 17, 1898, and the demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint on that day came on to be heard, counsel for plaintiffs and defendants appearing, whereupon the following proceedings took place:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hinkel v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Schubert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Kaufman & Broad Building Co. v. City & Suburban Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Kester v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Casner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API