Dupuis v. Interior Construction & Improvement Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was brought in the Wayne circuit court upon claim made under the following bill of particulars:
To 11^ days’ work of dredge Hercules and her crew............................................ $878 50
To changing dipper on dredge..................... 75 00
The plaintiff had verdict and judgment by direction of the court for'$150. He is not satisfied with the amount of the judgment, and brings the case to this Court by writ of error.
The claim made on the part of the plaintiff is that on or about the 29th day of November, 1889, the plaintiff, who was proprietor of a dredge, met one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Welch v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Gray v. HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Baker v. IngersollMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Cook v. HouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- People ex rel. Eaton v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Roulo v. Automobile Club of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. Howells v. MetcalfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.