Legal Opinion

McArver v. Gerukos

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1965No. 203PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLakes, J.

In passing upon a motion for judgment of nonsuit, the plaintiff’s evidence must be taken to be true and must be considered in the light most favorable to him. Only those portions of the defendant’s evidence which are favorable to the plaintiff may be considered upon such a motion.

So considered, the evidence is amply sufficient to show that the plaintiff and the defendant contracted as alleged in the complaint, that the defendant broke the contract and the plaintiff has been damaged thereby in the amount of $4,025 (only $4,008.33 being alleged in the complaint). The sole question, therefore,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Franknel v. Allied Mills, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Courtney v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Krause v. BoraksMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cansler v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Furr v. Fonville Morisey Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Fulton v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API