Roberts v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc., and its directors (collectively TriQuint) are defendants in two consolidated shareholder derivative suits filed in Multnomah County. TriQuint moved to dismiss those suits on the ground that its corporate bylaws establish Delaware as the exclusive forum for shareholder derivative suits. The trial court denied TriQuint’s motion to dismiss, and we allowed TriQuint’s petition for an alternative writ of mandamus. We now conclude that, as a matter of Delaware law, TriQuint’s bylaw is a valid forum-selection clause and binds its shareholders. We also conclude that, as a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drulias v. 1ST Century Bancshares, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Trinity v. Apex Directional Drilling LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Drulias v. 1st Century Bancshares, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Roberts v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015