Legal Opinion

Madden v. Watts

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 27, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Buchanan, J., Laurens, February, 1900. Action by Dora Madden against R. C. Watts, H. J. Haynesworth, and F. P. McGowan.

Read the full summary

Before Buchanan, J., Laurens, February, 1900. Action by Dora Madden against R. C. Watts, H. J. Haynesworth, and F. P. McGowan. From order sustaining demurrer of defendants, plaintiff appeals. cites: As to demand: 3 Barb., 584; 24 Barb., 300; 1 N. & M., 214; 2 Me., 246; 2 Bail., 51; x Hill, 62. Refusal of motion to amend is error: Code, Sec. 194; 26 S. C., 415; 16 S. C.-, 231; 20 S. C., 460; 30 S. C., 564; 41 S. C., 337; 54 S. C., 109. cite: Demand necessary: 1 McM., 182; 1 Hill Ch., 67; 41 S. C., 194; 8 S. C., 102; 6 Post. (Ala.), 35; 1 Fng. (Ark.), 382; 9 Mo., 697. Other defendants are only…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the 'Court was delivered by Judge Ernest Gary acting as Associate Justice, Chief Justice Mclver being disqualified.

Judge Ernest Gary, A. A. J.

This action was commenced on the 14th of August, 1897. As the questions raised by the exceptions arise under a demurrer, it will be necessary to set forth the complaint, which is as follows :

“The plaintiff named above, complaining of the defendants above named, respectfully shows unto the Court:
“I. That on or about the 21st of January, 1891, the said plaintiff employed the defendant, R. C. Watts, then an attorney at law, practicing his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bayne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. State v. Village of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neely v. LoveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Norwood Nat'l Bank v. Hutchings-Craig Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Craig v. Mutual Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API