Legal Opinion

Greene v. Helms

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1967No. 42572PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quidlian, Judge.

The single question for our determination is whether the evidence demanded a finding for the defendant in that the plaintiff failed, as a matter of law, to exercise ordinary care for his own safety.

The basic facts relative to this case are: the plaintiff was crossing Ponce de Leon Avenue in front of the Sears Roebuck store on July 13, 1961; Ponce de Leon at this point runs east and west and has three lanes of travel for automobile traffic in *449each direction; the plaintiff was crossing from south to north and had traveled across five of the lanes and was in the process of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. O'Dowd v. NewnhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Eddleman v. AskewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Eubanks v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Central Container Corp. v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Coleman v. Western & Atlantic RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson Atlantic, Inc. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Taylor v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Gaffron v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API