Legal Opinion

Amos v. Triangle Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 12, 1934No. 13,211PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiep in error is hereinafter referred to as Amos and defendant in error as the company.

The company sued Amos to recover a balance of $2,356.93 and interest due on sales of gasoline and motor oil. The answer was a general denial and two counterclaims. A motion to strike the counterclaims was sustained and amendments, differing in no material respect from the pleadings stricken, were filed and likewise stricken. The cause was tried to the court and the company made proof. Amos then offered proof under his counterclaims, to which offer an objection was sustained, and the company had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patrick v. Colorado Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henschel v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Jones v. Northeast Durango Water DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Twin Bridges Truck City, Inc. v. HallingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API