Legal Opinion

In Re Holly

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1988No. 76543PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

A petition was filed by the Georgia Mental Health Institute (GMHI) pursuant to OCGA § 37-3-81 for a determination whether Rhonda Holly, an involuntary patient in the petitioning treatment facility, should lie retained for involuntary treatment. After an evidentiary hearing in which Holly was represented by court-appointed counsel, the hearing officer appointed by the DeKalb County Probate Court found Holly met the statutory criteria requiring involuntary treatment as set out under OCGA § 37-3-1 (12) and entered a retention order. Holly, still represented by counsel, appealed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Acker v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Vaughan v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Blue v. R. L. Glosson Contracting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. John Doe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Griner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Coffee v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API