Legal Opinion
State v. Boling
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 26, 2006No. 22910-6-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
127 P.3d 740 (2006)
131 Wash.App. 329
STATE of Washington, Appellant,
v.
Brent W. BOLING, Respondent.
No. 22910-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
January 26, 2006.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
Janet G. Gemberling, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
¶ 1 A trial judge's decision to grant a new trial is entitled to great deference by this court. Here, the judge granted a new trial in a manslaughter case. A juror confessed that he injected the results of his independent Internet research on the cause of death into the jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. CaliguriWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BalisokWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Cumbie v. CumbieWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hughes A. BAGLEY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Shelly ArndtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.