Legal Opinion

Steiden v. Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 23, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

C. J. WADDILL, Special Commissioner.

Appellants, Hilda L. Steiden and her husband, Douglas Steiden, were plaintiffs in the trial court. Appellee, The Kroger Company, was the defendant in the trial court.

Mrs. Steiden was injured by being struck on the left shoulder while in the path of the exit door at a grocery operated by The Kroger Company. Mr. Steiden’s right to recovery is dependent upon his wife’s right to recovery.

The circuit judge granted summary judgment in favor of The Kroger Company. We are concerned with the question of whether Mrs. Steiden’s testimony, recorded in a discovery…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Humbert v. Audubon Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  2. Fisher v. HardestyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  3. J. C. Penney Co. v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  4. Peerless Mfg. Corporation v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Lackat v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. B & R CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API