Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Kirkover

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided February 3, 1893Published

Appeal from a judgment on report of referee. Action by Martha Taylor against Henry D. Kirkover. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The complaint herein alleged that the plaintiff, prior to May 1,1890, leased to the defendant certain premises, specifying them, for the term of six months from said May 1st, for and at the agreed price of $100 a month, payable on the 1st day of each month; that defendant took possession of and occupied said premises under this agreement, and has made defaults in payment for four months, whereby there became due and owing to plaintiff the sum of $400, with interest thereon from the several dates when payment fell due, for which sum, with interest, plaintiff demanded judgment. The answer is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vail v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. McKecknie v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Bruyn v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Foo Long v. Chu FongNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API