Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Minneapolis Mut. Fire Ins.

WOODS, Circuit Judge,

(after stating the facts as above orally.) The facts in this case are essentially the same as in the case of Ehrman v. Insurance Co., 1 Fed. Rep. 471, and the statute of Indiana, under which the summons against the defendant was served upon the auditor of state, is similar to the statute of Arkansas construed in that case. We quote from the decision, (page 476:)

“The citizen insuring his property in this state is not required to search the files of the auditor’s office for the purpose of ascertaining whether the company has filed the required stipulation, and otherwise…