Legal Opinion

Holick v. Burkhart

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 13, 2019No. 6:16-cv-01188Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARK HOLICK, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-1188-JWB JULIE A. BURKHART, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend judgment. (Doc. 271.) The motion is fully briefed and is ripe for decision. (Docs. 272, 273, 274.) For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend (Doc. 271) is DENIED. I. Summary Plaintiff moves pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) to alter or amend the court’s summary judgment ruling (Doc. 270) insofar as it dismissed Plaintiff’s abuse of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Appointment of Umpire for Hayes Family Trust v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Jackson & Scherer, Inc. v. WashburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Welch v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Caldwell-Baker Co. v. TidemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Thomas v. CITY OF BAXTER SPRINGS, KAN.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API