Legal Opinion

Poulter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1913No. 2207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of perjury and his penalty fixed at the lowest prescribed by law, — two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant made no motion to quash the indictment on any ground. In his motion for new trial he complains of the indictment in some particulars. The indictment is in accordance with the approved form therefor and it fully complies with the statutes prescribing the offense (P.C., arts 304 to 308, inclusive), and with the statutes prescribing the requisites of an indictment for such offense. (Arts. 451, 465, 453 and 460, C.C.P.)

Appellant has some fourteen bills of exception.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. McClelland v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Sweeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Skinner v. GrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Bartlett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Wooldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Orner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API