Yegge v. State

DAVIS, Senior Judge, Specially

concurring.

Because' in Yegge v. State, 88 So.3d 1058, 1059-60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), this court held that’ Yegge’s ten-year sentence — including the 10/20/Life minimum mandatory enhancement — is-legal, I must concur with the majority opinion. However, it is my opinion that because Yegge maintained his youthful offender status when he was re-sentenced on remand, the 10/20/Life sen-*558fencing enhancement1 statute, section 775.087(2), does not apply to this new sentence.1 Accordingly,, it is my belief that this court should recede from Yegge, 88 So.3d 1058, reverse…