Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Coburn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1938No. 26448 and 26449PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyees, J.

In these two cases the ultimate facts are substantially in accord. In each case plaintiff, the Superintendent of Banks, is attempting to collect from the defendant executor superadded liability assessed on the holders of bank stock by reason of the liquidation of The Ohio Valley Bank of Portsmouth, Ohio. The date of the assessment occurred prior to the amendment of the Constitution (Article XIII, Section 3) abolishing double liability on bank stock in Ohio.

Keeping in mind that we have two actions for collection of the same claim, one, No. 26448, first filed in the Court of Common Pleas, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beach v. MiznerOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. BremerOhio Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. v. Joyce Building Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Estate of ErbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. In Re Estate of HoweOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. In Re Estate of VitelliOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Town of Milton v. BrusoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API