Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Amsden

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 15, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Bill in Chancery. Heard upon pleadings and master’s report and exceptions thereto at the May Term, 1897, Windsor County, before Start, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtRowell, J.

This is a bill to enjoin the defendant, assignee in insolvency of Whitcomb, from further prosecuting an action of trover against the orators for goods claimed to belong to the insolvent’s estate, and from commencing any other action or proceeding against them in respect thereof.

On April 21, 1893, Whitcomb and Angelí, then partners in the furniture business at Windsor, gave to the orators a chattel mortgage of their entire stock in trade, to secure the orators for having the day before signed a demand note with them at the Windsor Savings Bank for $500; and the mortgage was recorded the next…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clinkinbeard v. ClinkinbeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  2. Holt v. DanielsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  3. Prout v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
  4. Gilbert v. VailSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  5. Dunshee v. ParmeleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barber v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  2. In Re Riggi Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Fife v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  4. Hitchcock v. KennisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. City of Montpelier v. McMahonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API