Legal Opinion

Dalton Adding MacHine Co. v. State Corp. Commission of Virginia

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1915No. 190PublishedCited by 43 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an appeal from an order of three. Judges denying a preliminary injunction as prayed in the appellant’s bill. The bill alleges that the appellant is a Missouri corporation, having.its factory in Missouri, that it obtains orders for its machines in Virginia through drummers, considers and accepts or rejects them' in Missouri, and, if it accepts, forwards the machine from its factory. In some cases the possible .customer is allowed to try a machine previously forwarded and in the hands of the Virginia agent, and if he is accepted as a purchaser and desires to keep it, is permitted to do…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. KoehneSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. First Nat. Bank of Albuquerque v. AlbrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Di Giovanni v. Camden Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API