Legal Opinion

Joice v. Canal-Boats Nos. 1,758 & 1,892

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 17, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. On motion to sot aside additional process.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Upon the arrest of tho two canal-boats named in the libel in a cause of collision, the libelant’s vessel having run into the said boats in making her landing, as they lay concealed near a dock at Yonkers, the owners and claimants of the two sunken boats filed a petition, under the fifty-ninth supreme court rule in admiralty; alleging that Poene Bros, were the proprietors of the dock, and were the parties through whose negligence the boats were sunk, by mooring them improperly and leav*554ing them unprotected, and that they gave no notice of the danger. Further process was thereupon issued against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Six Hundred & Thirty Casks of SherryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1878
  2. Vaughan v. Six Hundred & Thirty Casks of Sherry WineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Savas v. John C.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1960
  3. The SamsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API