Commonwealth v. Williams
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
1. The defendant was not entitled as of right to have the prospective jurors interrogated individually in accordance with the provisions of G. L. c. 234, § 28, second par., as amended by St. 1975, c. 335. From the bare assertion in the affidavit filed by counsel for the defendant that racial prejudice is widespread in Hampden County the judge was not required to conclude that the statutory preconditions to the right of individual voir dire had been made to appear. Compare Common*924wealth v. Corgain, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 899 (1977); Commonwealth v. Hogue, ante 901 (1978). 2. The bill of exceptions…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. CorgainMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BresillaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Burke v. GallisonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. LaFailleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. GarrettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.