Legal Opinion

Halinskyi v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 7, 2020No. 18-1413Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-1413 Halinskyi v. Barr UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yun-Zui Guan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Gao v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. Hui Lin Huang v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. H-L-H- & Z-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
  5. Maladho Djehe Diallo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API